Perfis clínicos e genéticos de pacientes com amiloidose transtiretina hereditária e do tipo selvagem: o registro de amiloidose cardíaca transtiretina no Estado de São Paulo, Brasil (REACT-SP) / Clinical and genetic profiles of patients with hereditary and wild-type transthyretin amyloidosis: the transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis registry in the State of São Paulo, Brazil (REACT-SP)

INTRODUÇÃO: A amiloidose transtiretina (ATTR) é uma doença multissistêmica causada pela deposição de proteína fibrilar em órgãos e tecidos. Os genótipos e fenótipos da ATTR são altamente heterogêneos. MÉTODOS: Apresentamos dados sobre sinais e sintomas físicos, avaliações cardíacas e neurológicas, e genética em pacientes incluídos no Registro de Amiloidose Cardíaca Transtiretina no Estado de São Paulo (REACT-SP), Brasil. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 644 pacientes, sendo 505 com a forma variante (ATTRv) e 139 com a forma selvagem (ATTRwt). Dezesseis mutações diferentes foram detectadas, sendo as mais comuns Val50Met (48,3%) e V142Ile (40,8%). No geral, mais da metade dos pacientes apresentou envolvimento cardíaco, e a diferença nessa proporção entre os grupos ATTRv e ATTRwt foi significativa (43,9 vs. 89,9%; p<0,001). O fenótipo neurológico também diferiu entre ATTRv e ATTRwt (56,8 vs. 31,7%; p<0,001). O fenótipo misto foi encontrado em 25,6% da população, sem diferença significativa entre as formas de amiloidose. Um grupo de pacientes permaneceu assintomático (10,4%), com uma proporção menor de pacientes assintomáticos no grupo ATTRwt. CONCLUSÕES: Este estudo detalha o espectro clínico e genético de pacientes com ATTR em São Paulo, Brasil. Esta análise preliminar destaca a considerável heterogeneidade fenotípica das manifestações neurológicas e cardíacas em pacientes com ATTR variante e ATTR do tipo selvagem.

Survival of Heart Transplant Patients with Chagas' Disease Under Different Antiproliferative Immunosuppressive Regimens. / Sobrevida de Pacientes Transplantados Cardíacos com Doença de Chagas Sob Diferentes Regimes de Imunossupressores Antiproliferativos.

Chagas' disease (CD) is an important cause of heart transplantation (HT). The main obstacle is Chagas' disease reactivation (CDR), usually associated to high doses of immunosuppressants. Previous studies have suggested an association of mycophenolate mofetil with increased CDR. However, mortality predictors are unknown. To identify mortality risk factors in heart transplant patients with CD and the impact of antiproliferative regimen on survival. Retrospective study with CD patients who underwent HT between January 2004 and September 2020, under immunosuppression protocol that prioritized azathioprine and change to mycophenolate mofetil in case of rejection. We performed univariate regression to identify mortality predictors; and compared survival, rejection and evidence of CDR between who received azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil and those who changed from azathioprine to mycophenolate mofetil after discharge ("Change" group). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Eighty-five patients were included, 54.1% men, median age 49 (39-57) years, and 91.8% were given priority in waiting list. Nineteen (22.4%) used azathioprine, 37 (43.5%) mycophenolate mofetil and 29 (34.1%) switched therapy; survival was not different between groups, 2.9 (1.6-5.0) x 2.9 (1.8-4.8) x 4.2 (2.0-5.0) years, respectively; p=0.4. There was no difference in rejection (42%, 73% and 59% respectively; p=0.08) or in CDR (T. cruzi positive by endomyocardial biopsy 5% x 11% x 7%; p=0.7; benznidazole use 58% x 65% x 69%; p=0.8; positive PCR for T. cruzi 20% x 68% x 42% respectively; p=0.1) rates. This retrospective study did not show difference in survival in heart transplant patients with CD receiving different antiproliferative regimens. Mycophenolate mofetil was not associated with statistically higher rates of CDR or graft rejection in this cohort. New randomized clinical trials are necessary to address this issue.

A Doença de Chagas (DC) é uma causa importante de transplante cardíaco (TC). O principal obstáculo é a reativação da DC (RDC), normalmente associada a altas doses de imunossupressores. Estudos anteriores sugeriram uma associação do micofenolato de mofetila com aumento na RDC. No entanto, preditores de mortalidade são desconhecidos. Identificar os fatores de risco de mortalidade em pacientes com DC após o TC e o impacto do regime antiproliferativo sobre a sobrevida. Estudo retrospectivo com pacientes chagásicos submetidos ao TC entre janeiro de 2004 e setembro de 2020, em protocolo de imunossupressão que priorizava o uso de azatioprina e sua mudança para micofenolato de mofetila em caso de rejeição. Realizamos regressão univariada para identificar preditores de mortalidade e comparamos sobrevida, rejeição, e evidência RDC entre os pacientes que usavam azatioprina, micofenolato de mofetila, e aqueles que mudaram de azatioprina para micofenolato (grupo "Mudança") após a alta. Um valor de p<0,05 foi considerado estatisticamente significativo. Foram incluídos 85 pacientes, 54,1% homens, idade mediana 49 (39-57) anos, e 91,8% com prioridade na lista de espera. Dezenove (22,4%) usavam azatioprina, 37 (43,5%) micofenolato de mofetila, e 29 (34,1%) trocaram a terapia; a sobrevida não foi diferente entre os grupos, 2,9 (1,6-5,0) x 2,9 (1,8-4,8) x 4,2 (2,0-5,0) anos, respectivamente; p=0,4. Não houve diferença na taxa de rejeição (42%, 73% e 59% respectivamente; p=0,08) ou de RDC (T. cruzi positiva na biópsia endomiocárdica 5% x 11% x 7%; p=0,7; uso benzonidazol 58% x 65% x 69%; p=0,8; PCR positiva para T. cruzi 20% x 68% x 42% respectivamente; p=0,1). Este estudo retrospectivo com pacientes com DC e TC não mostrou diferença na sobrevida entre os diferentes regimes antiproliferativos. O uso de micofenolato de mofetila não foi associado com taxas significativamente mais altas de RDC ou rejeição do enxerto nesta coorte. Novos ensaios randomizados são necessários para abordar essa questão.

Sobrevida de Pacientes Transplantados Cardíacos com Doença de Chagas Sob Diferentes Regimes de Imunossupressores Antiproliferativos / Survival of Heart Transplant Patients with Chagas' Disease Under Different Antiproliferative Immunosuppressive Regimens

Resumo Fundamento A Doença de Chagas (DC) é uma causa importante de transplante cardíaco (TC). O principal obstáculo é a reativação da DC (RDC), normalmente associada a altas doses de imunossupressores. Estudos anteriores sugeriram uma associação do micofenolato de mofetila com aumento na RDC. No entanto, preditores de mortalidade são desconhecidos. Objetivos Identificar os fatores de risco de mortalidade em pacientes com DC após o TC e o impacto do regime antiproliferativo sobre a sobrevida. Métodos Estudo retrospectivo com pacientes chagásicos submetidos ao TC entre janeiro de 2004 e setembro de 2020, em protocolo de imunossupressão que priorizava o uso de azatioprina e sua mudança para micofenolato de mofetila em caso de rejeição. Realizamos regressão univariada para identificar preditores de mortalidade e comparamos sobrevida, rejeição, e evidência RDC entre os pacientes que usavam azatioprina, micofenolato de mofetila, e aqueles que mudaram de azatioprina para micofenolato (grupo "Mudança") após a alta. Um valor de p<0,05 foi considerado estatisticamente significativo. Resultados Foram incluídos 85 pacientes, 54,1% homens, idade mediana 49 (39-57) anos, e 91,8% com prioridade na lista de espera. Dezenove (22,4%) usavam azatioprina, 37 (43,5%) micofenolato de mofetila, e 29 (34,1%) trocaram a terapia; a sobrevida não foi diferente entre os grupos, 2,9 (1,6-5,0) x 2,9 (1,8-4,8) x 4,2 (2,0-5,0) anos, respectivamente; p=0,4. Não houve diferença na taxa de rejeição (42%, 73% e 59% respectivamente; p=0,08) ou de RDC (T. cruzi positiva na biópsia endomiocárdica 5% x 11% x 7%; p=0,7; uso benzonidazol 58% x 65% x 69%; p=0,8; PCR positiva para T. cruzi 20% x 68% x 42% respectivamente; p=0,1). Conclusões Este estudo retrospectivo com pacientes com DC e TC não mostrou diferença na sobrevida entre os diferentes regimes antiproliferativos. O uso de micofenolato de mofetila não foi associado com taxas significativamente mais altas de RDC ou rejeição do enxerto nesta coorte. Novos ensaios randomizados são necessários para abordar essa questão.

Abstract Background Chagas' disease (CD) is an important cause of heart transplantation (HT). The main obstacle is Chagas' disease reactivation (CDR), usually associated to high doses of immunosuppressants. Previous studies have suggested an association of mycophenolate mofetil with increased CDR. However, mortality predictors are unknown. Objectives To identify mortality risk factors in heart transplant patients with CD and the impact of antiproliferative regimen on survival. Methods Retrospective study with CD patients who underwent HT between January 2004 and September 2020, under immunosuppression protocol that prioritized azathioprine and change to mycophenolate mofetil in case of rejection. We performed univariate regression to identify mortality predictors; and compared survival, rejection and evidence of CDR between who received azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil and those who changed from azathioprine to mycophenolate mofetil after discharge ("Change" group). A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Eighty-five patients were included, 54.1% men, median age 49 (39-57) years, and 91.8% were given priority in waiting list. Nineteen (22.4%) used azathioprine, 37 (43.5%) mycophenolate mofetil and 29 (34.1%) switched therapy; survival was not different between groups, 2.9 (1.6-5.0) x 2.9 (1.8-4.8) x 4.2 (2.0-5.0) years, respectively; p=0.4. There was no difference in rejection (42%, 73% and 59% respectively; p=0.08) or in CDR (T. cruzi positive by endomyocardial biopsy 5% x 11% x 7%; p=0.7; benznidazole use 58% x 65% x 69%; p=0.8; positive PCR for T. cruzi 20% x 68% x 42% respectively; p=0.1) rates. Conclusions This retrospective study did not show difference in survival in heart transplant patients with CD receiving different antiproliferative regimens. Mycophenolate mofetil was not associated with statistically higher rates of CDR or graft rejection in this cohort. New randomized clinical trials are necessary to address this issue.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Heart Transplant Recipients With Coronavirus-19 Disease in a High-volume Transplant Center.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplant (HT) recipients may be at higher risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection and developing critical illness. The aim of this study is to describe characteristics and outcomes of HT recipients infected by SARS-COV-2, from a high-volume transplant center. METHODS: We have described data of all adult HT recipients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 by RT-PCR in nasopharyngeal samples from April 5, 2020, to January 5, 2021. Outcomes and follow-up were recorded until February 5, 2021. RESULTS: Forty patients were included. Twenty-four patients (60%) were men; the median age was 53 (40-60) y old; median HT time was 34 mo; and median follow-up time 162 d. The majority needed hospitalization (83%). Immunosuppressive therapy was reduced/withdrawn in the majority of patients, except from steroids, which were maintained. Seventeen patients (42.5%) were classified as having severe disease according to the ordinal scale developed by the World Health Organization Committee. They tended to have lower absolute lymphocyte count (P < 0.001) during follow-up when compared with patients with mild disease. Thirty-day mortality was 12.5%. However, a longer follow-up revealed increased later mortality (27.5%), with median time to death around 35 d. Bacterial nosocomial infections were a leading cause of death. Cardiac allograft rejection (10%) and ventricular dysfunction (12.5%) were also not negligible. CONCLUSIONS: Major findings of this study corroborate other cohorts' results, but it also reports significant rate of later events, suggesting that a strict midterm surveillance is advisable to HT recipients with coronavirus disease 2019.

Distinct Microbial Communities in Dilated Cardiomyopathy Explanted Hearts Are Associated With Different Myocardial Rejection Outcomes.

Background: Idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM) myocardial inflammation may be associated with external triggering factors such as infectious agents. Here, we searched if moderate/severe heart transplantation rejection is related to the presence of myocardial inflammation in IDCM explanted hearts, associated with microbial communities. Method: Receptor myocardial samples from 18 explanted hearts were separated into groups according to post-transplant outcome: persistent moderate rejection (PMR; n = 6), moderate rejection (MR; n = 7) that regressed after pulse therapy, and no rejection (NR; n = 5)/light intensity rejection. Inflammation was quantified through immunohistochemistry (IHC), and infectious agents were evaluated by IHC, molecular biology, in situ hybridization technique, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Results: NR presented lower numbers of macrophages, as well as B cells (p = 0.0001), and higher HLA class II expression (p ≤ 0.0001). PMR and MR showed higher levels of Mycoplasma pneumoniae (p = 0.003) and hepatitis B core (p = 0.0009) antigens. NR presented higher levels of parvovirus B19 (PVB19) and human herpes virus 6 (HHV6) and a positive correlation between Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) and enterovirus genes. Molecular biology demonstrated the presence of M. pneumoniae, Bb, HHV6, and PVB19 genes in all studied groups. TEM revealed structures compatible with the cited microorganisms. Conclusions: This initial study investigating on infectious agents and inflammation in the IDCM explanted hearts showed that the association between M. pneumoniae and hepatitis B core was associated with a worse outcome after HT, represented by MR and PMR, suggesting that different IDCM microbial communities may be contributing to post-transplant myocardial rejection.

C-Reactive protein level and left ventricular mass are associated with acute cellular rejection after heart transplant.

OBJECTIVES: Acute cellular rejection (ACR) remains a major complication of heart transplant (HT). The gold standard for its diagnosis is endomyocardial biopsy (EMB), whereas the role of non-invasive biomarkers for detecting ACR is unclear. This study aimed to identify non-invasive biomarkers for the diagnosis of ACR in patients undergoing HT and presenting with normal left ventricular function. METHODS: We evaluated patients who underwent HT at a single center between January 2010 and June 2019. Patients were enrolled after HT, and those with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction before EMB were excluded. We included only the results of the first EMB performed at least 30 days after HT (median, 90 days). Troponin, B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured and echocardiography was performed up to 7 days before EMB. ACR was defined as International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade 2R or 3R on EMB. We performed logistic regression analysis to identify the non-invasive predictors of ACR (2R or 3R) and evaluated the accuracy of each using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: We analyzed 72 patients after HT (51.31±13.63 years; 25 [34.7%] women); of them, 9 (12.5%) developed ACR. Based on multivariate logistic regression analysis, we performed forward stepwise selection (entry criteria, p<0.05). The only independent predictors that remained in the model were CRP level and LV mass index. The optimal cut-off point for CRP level was ≥15.9 mg/L (odds ratio [OR], 11.7; p=0.007) and that for LV mass index was ≥111 g/m2 (OR, 13.6; p=0.003). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve derived from this model was 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.99), with sensitivity of 85.7% (95% CI, 42.1%-99.6%), specificity of 78.4% (95% CI, 64.7%-88.7%), positive predictive value of 35.3% (95% CI, 14.3%-61.7%), and negative predictive value of 97.6% (95% CI, 87.1%-99.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing HT, CRP level and LV mass were directly associated with ACR, but troponin and BNP levels were not.

Registry of transthyretin amyloidosis in the state of São Paulo (REACT-SP) / Registro em amiloidose transtirretina do estado de São Paulo (REACT-SP)

BACKGROUND: Amyloidosis is a systemic disease that involves multiple organs, characterized by the deposition of amyloid fibrils. Knowledge regarding the epidemiological, clinical, and genetic profile of the population affected by amyloidosis throughout the country is of fundamental importance for establishing diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the epidemiological, clinical, laboratory, imaging, and treatment variables of patients with TTR cardiac amyloidosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective, prospective, and observational study based on collection of data on the natural history of patients with TTR amyloidosis, followed in the state of São Paulo. RESULTS: To make it possible to map the regional distribution of the disease, increasing knowledge about the disease among clinicians and specialists in different areas. To evaluate patients with hereditary and wild-type TTR amyloidosis, in addition to following individuals with positive genotype and negative phenotype.

FUNDAMENTO: A amiloidose é uma doença sistêmica com envolvimento de diversos órgãos caracterizada pela deposição de fibrilas amiloides. O conhecimento do perfil epidemiológico, clínico e genético da população acometida por amiloidose no país é de fundamental importância em estratégias para estabelecer o diagnóstico bem como as estratégias terapêuticas. OBJETIVO: Avaliar as variáveis epidemiológicas, clínicas, laboratoriais, de imagem e tratamento dos pacientes com amiloidose cardíaca por transtirretina (TTR). MATERIAL E MÉTODOS: Estudo multicêntrico, retrospectivo, prospectivo e observacional baseado na coleta de dados da história natural dos pacientes com amiloidose TTR seguidos no estado de São Paulo. RESULTADOS: Permitir um mapa da distribuição regional da doença, aumentando o conhecimento da doença entre clínicos e especialistas nas diversas especialidades. Avaliar pacientes com amiloidose por TTR formas familiar e selvagem além de acompanhar indivíduos com genótipo positivo e fenótipo negativo. CONCLUSÃO: As informações coletadas poderão evidenciar uma maior conscientização da doença, criação de novos fluxogramas diagnósticos e de tratamento com impacto direto no conhecimento da história natural da doença e prognóstico dos pacientes.

SARS-CoV-2 Infection and CMV Dissemination in Transplant Recipients as a Treatment for Chagas Cardiomyopathy: A Case Report.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). COVID-19 has infected over 90 million people worldwide, therefore it is considered a pandemic. SARS-CoV-2 infection can lead to severe pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), septic shock, and/or organ failure. Individuals receiving a heart transplantation (HT) may be at higher risk of adverse outcomes attributable to COVID-19 due to immunosuppressives, as well as concomitant infections that may also influence the prognoses. Herein, we describe the first report of two cases of HT recipients with concomitant infections by SARS-CoV-2, Trypanosoma cruzi, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) dissemination, from the first day of hospitalization due to COVID-19 in the intensive care unit (ICU) until the death of the patients.

Usefulness of PCR for Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in blood and endomyocardial biopsies for detection of Chagas disease reactivation after heart transplantation: A comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Chagas disease reactivation (CDR) after heart transplantation is characterized by relapse of the infectious disease with proliferation and dissemination of Trypanosoma cruzi parasites. Serial blood PCR testing is consensually recommended for CDR monitoring, but there is uncertainty about the incremental value in performing the molecular tests in endomyocardial biopsies (EMB). METHODS: We compared qualitative and quantitative results of PCR for T cruzi DNA in 62 pairs of blood and EMB collected with a maximum time interval of 7 days, from 34 heart-transplanted, chagasic patients. RESULTS: Blood PCR resulted positive in 39/62 (62.9%) samples, with PL ranging from 0.14 to 1610.73 (median: 3.31). PCR resulted positive in 8/60 (13.3%) EMB, with PL ranging from 2.82 to 1670.55 (median: 65.63). All blood samples which tested negative presented a paired EMB which also tested negative. However, 31/39 (79.5%) blood samples which tested positive presented a paired EMB which tested negative. There was poor agreement between blood and EMB PCR (kappa = 0.153). CDR affecting the myocardium (myo-CDR) was diagnosed in three occasions. PCR resulted positive in both blood and EMB at the time of myo-CDR, with PL ranging from 0.61 to 1610.73 in blood and 13.8 to 1670.55 in EMB. CONCLUSIONS: Negative PCR for T cruzi in blood rules out myo-CDR, with no value of testing EMB. Positive PCR in blood with high PL is diagnostic for myo-CDR. If PCR in blood results positive with low PL, testing EMB is useful: negative PCR turns unlikely, and positive PCR reinforces greatly the possibility of myo-CDR.